Skip to content
logo_color
  • Free FMEA Course
  • Services
Contact Us
Contact Us
logo_color

Introduction to FMEA

5
  • What is Risk in FMEA? Why Prevention Important?
  • Introduction to FMEA | Purpose & Key Benefits
  • History of FMEA – NASA to AIAG to AIAG-VDA
  • Types of FMEA – DFMEA, PFMEA, and FMEA-MSR
  • FMEA in APQP & IATF 16949 Context

Foundations of FMEA

7
  • Function Requirement Failure in FMEA
  • Severity in FMEA (AIAG-VDA) | Explained with Examples
  • Occurrence in FMEA (AIAG-VDA) | Explained with Examples
  • Detection in FMEA (AIAG-VDA) | Explained with Examples
  • RPN vs Action Priority (AP) – Why RPN is Outdated
  • FMEA Linkages – ISO 9001, IATF 16949, APQP, PPAP.
  • Why AIAG-VDA 7-Step Approach?

Step-1: Planning & Preparation in FMEA

4
  • Step 1 – Planning & Preparation in FMEA (AIAG-VDA Standard)
  • The Five Ts in FMEA – Intent, Timing, Team, Task, Tools
  • Defining Scope, Boundaries & Assumptions in FMEA
  • Cross-Functional Team Formation in FMEA

Step 2: Structure Analysis in FMEA

4
  • Step 2 – Structure Analysis in FMEA
  • System, Subsystem, and Component Breakdown in FMEA
  • Process Flow – Structure Tree & Block Diagram in FMEA
  • Motor Stator Winding – Structure Analysis in FMEA Example

Step 3: Function Analysis in FMEA

3
  • Step 3 – Function Analysis in FMEA
  • Defining Functions & Requirements in FMEA
  • How to Write Measurable Requirements in FMEA

Step 4: Failure Analysis in FMEA

6
  • Step 4 – Failure Analysis in FMEA (Failure Modes, Effects, Causes)
  • Function Net in FMEA | Chain of Functions
  • Failure at Mode Level – Failure Modes
  • Effects of Failure in FMEA
  • Causes of Failure in FMEA (Design vs Process)
  • Cascading Failures – Failure Cause Mode Effect Relationship in FMEA

Step 5: Risk Analysis in FMEA

9
  • Current Detection Controls in FMEA
  • Current Prevention Controls in FMEA (AIAG-VDA Standard)
  • Risk Evaluation in FMEA
  • Action Priority (AP) vs RPN in FMEA
  • Action Priority in FMEA (AIAG-VDA Standard)
  • Step 5 – Risk Analysis in FMEA
  • Severity in FMEA (AIAG-VDA) | Explained with Examples
  • Occurrence in FMEA (AIAG-VDA) | Explained with Examples
  • Detection in FMEA (AIAG-VDA) | Explained with Examples

Step 6: Optimization in FMEA

2
  • Tracking & Closing Actions in FMEA
  • Step 6 – Optimization in FMEA

Step 7: Results Documentation in FMEA

3
  • Customer Communication & Lessons Learned in FMEA
  • FMEA Report (Summary Table)
  • Step 7 – Results Documentation in FMEA

DFMEA in Practice

8
  • DFMEA in Practice – Step‑by‑Step
  • DFMEA Audit Readiness
  • DFMEA Optimization Step
  • DFMEA Risk Analysis
  • DFMEA Failure Analysis
  • DFMEA Function Analysis
  • DFMEA Structure Analysis
  • Product Snapshot – DFMEA in Practice (Step-by-Step)

PFMEA in Practice

10
  • PFMEA Audit Readiness
  • PFMEA Results Documentation
  • PFMEA Optimization step
  • PFMEA Risk Analysis
  • PFMEA Failure Analysis
  • PFMEA Function Analysis
  • PFMEA Structure Analysis
  • PFMEA Planning and Preparation
  • PFMEA Process Snapshot
  • PFMEA in Practice – Step‑by‑Step

FMEA Linkages

5
  • 📘 Case Study: How DFMEA Links to PFMEA and Control Plan — A Practical Guide
  • How FMEA Links to PPAP Deliverables
  • Prevention and Detection Controls in PFMEA to Control Plan | How to Link Them
  • How FMEA Drives Control Plans in Manufacturing Quality
  • FMEA and Control Plan Linkage

FMEA Tools & Templates

3
  • Excel vs Professional FMEA Software: Explain
  • FMEA in APIS IQ, PLATO SCIO, and Knowlence TDC: Overview of Top FMEA Software Tools
  • Excel-Based AIAG-VDA FMEA Template (Walkthrough)

FMEA Best Practices

2
  • FMEA Moderation: Common Mistakes & Best Practices
  • Common Mistakes & Best Practices in FMEA Creation

FMEA Advanced Applications

12
  • Future of FMEA – AI, Automation & Digital Technology
  • FMEA Use Cases in EVs, Welding, Electronics & Embedded Systems
  • Internal & Customer FMEA Audit Preparation
  • FMEA Moderation Techniques for Cross-Functional Teams
  • Advanced Failure Cause Modeling in FMEA
  • Family FMEA – Save Time Across Product Lines
  • FMEA in APQP Phases and Project Milestones
  • Using FMEA in Functional Safety (ISO 26262)
  • What is System FMEA? Scope, Structure & Interface Analysis
  • Which FMEA Software Should You Choose?
  • Software for FMEA
  • How FMEA Links with Control Plan, PPAP & Special Characteristics
View Categories
  • Home
  • FMEA Knowledge base
  • Step 5: Risk Analysis in FMEA
  • Risk Evaluation in FMEA

Risk Evaluation in FMEA

FMEA Expert
Updated on October 7, 2025

3 min read

In Step 5: Risk Analysis of the AIAG-VDA 7-Step FMEA approach, once Severity, Occurrence, and Detection have been rated, the next task is to evaluate the risks.

👉 Risk Evaluation Criteria answer the question:
“Do we need to take action, or is the risk acceptable as it is?”

The AIAG-VDA standard uses Action Priority (AP) instead of the outdated Risk Priority Number (RPN) to guide these decisions.


What is Risk Evaluation in FMEA? #

  • Definition: Risk evaluation is the process of interpreting the S, O, D ratings to decide whether a failure mode requires corrective action.
  • Goal: Ensure that safety-critical, compliance-related, and high-impact risks are always prioritized.
  • Tool: The Action Priority (AP) table provides standardized evaluation criteria.

📌 Risk evaluation does not eliminate subjectivity, but it ensures decisions are consistent, documented, and customer-focused.


Key Elements of Risk Evaluation Criteria #

1. Severity (S) – Effect-Driven

  • Highest priority factor.
  • Severity ≥ 9 or 10 (safety/regulatory risks) = High Priority (H), action required regardless of O or D.
  • Example: Airbag fails to deploy → Severity = 10 → Always High.

2. Occurrence (O) – Cause Frequency

  • Reflects likelihood of cause.
  • Higher occurrence = higher Action Priority.
  • Example: Bolt under-torqued found in 5% audits → Occurrence = 7 → High risk.

3. Detection (D) – Control Strength

  • Reflects ability of controls to detect before customer impact.
  • Weak detection (ratings 7–10) pushes AP towards High.
  • Example: Visual inspection only → Detection = 8 → Weak control.

4. Action Priority (AP) – Final Decision

  • Combines S, O, D into High (H), Medium (M), Low (L) priorities.
  • Defines whether action is mandatory, recommended, or optional.

AIAG-VDA Risk Evaluation Categories #

CategoryMeaningAction Guidance
High (H)Unacceptable riskAction required immediately
Medium (M)Acceptable with cautionAction recommended, justify if no action taken
Low (L)Acceptable riskNo action required, justification must be documented

📌 Even Low (L) risks must be documented with justification.


Example – Risk Evaluation Using AP #

PFMEA – Bolting Operation

  • Function: Secure suspension bolt at 100 ± 5 Nm.
  • Failure Mode: Under-torque.
  • Severity = 9 (safety-critical).
  • Occurrence = 3 (rare).
  • Detection = 7 (weak, manual check).

👉 AP = High Priority (H) → Action required.

Corrective Action: Introduced automatic torque monitoring → Detection improved to 2 → AP reduced to Medium (M).


Case Study – DFMEA for Electric Motor #

  • Function: Provide rotation at 2000 ± 50 RPM.
  • Failure Mode: Motor does not rotate.
  • Severity = 8.
  • Occurrence = 5.
  • Detection = 6.

👉 AP = Medium (M) → Action recommended.
Decision: Team added additional insulation and motor testing.


Best Practices for Risk Evaluation in FMEA #

  1. Always prioritize Severity first – especially S ≥ 9 risks.
  2. Use real data (SPC, warranty, lessons learned) to set O ratings.
  3. Be realistic about Detection – manual checks = weak detection.
  4. Document justifications for all Medium and Low risks.
  5. Review AP regularly as design/process changes or controls improve.
  6. Involve cross-functional teams to reduce subjectivity.

Common Mistakes to Avoid #

  • Still using RPN thresholds instead of AP.
  • Ignoring safety risks with low occurrence values.
  • Overrating manual inspections as “strong detection.”
  • Failing to document why Low or Medium risks were accepted.

Why Risk Evaluation Criteria Matter #

  • Ensures customer safety and compliance come first.
  • Provides objective, consistent, and auditable prioritization.
  • Helps allocate resources to the most critical risks.
  • Strengthens trust with OEMs and auditors.

Key Takeaways #

  • Risk Evaluation in FMEA = interpreting S, O, D → Action Priority (AP).
  • Severity ≥ 9–10 always = High Priority, mandatory action.
  • AP categories: High = action required, Medium = action recommended, Low = acceptable with justification.
  • Risk evaluation ensures FMEA is a practical risk-prevention tool, not just paperwork.

Next Lesson #

👉 Continue with Lesson 3.7: Step 6 – Optimization (Actions & Re-Evaluation)

Updated on October 7, 2025

Are this content helpful..

  • Happy
  • Normal
  • Sad

Share This Article :

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
Current Prevention Controls in FMEA (AIAG-VDA Standard)Action Priority (AP) vs RPN in FMEA
Table of Contents
  • What is Risk Evaluation in FMEA?
  • Key Elements of Risk Evaluation Criteria
  • AIAG-VDA Risk Evaluation Categories
  • Example – Risk Evaluation Using AP
  • Case Study – DFMEA for Electric Motor
  • Best Practices for Risk Evaluation in FMEA
  • Common Mistakes to Avoid
  • Why Risk Evaluation Criteria Matter
  • Key Takeaways
  • Next Lesson
  • Free FMEA Course
  • Services
Contact Us
Contact Us
logo_color

One touch solution for FMEA documentation training or creation and support.

Connect

Learn

  • Knowledge base
  • Training
  • Newsletter

Company

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Services
  • Products
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Connect

© 2026 Quality Assist

Powered by Quality Assist