Skip to content
logo_color
  • Free FMEA Course
  • Services
Contact Us
Contact Us
logo_color

Introduction to FMEA

5
  • What is Risk in FMEA? Why Prevention Important?
  • Introduction to FMEA | Purpose & Key Benefits
  • History of FMEA – NASA to AIAG to AIAG-VDA
  • Types of FMEA – DFMEA, PFMEA, and FMEA-MSR
  • FMEA in APQP & IATF 16949 Context

Foundations of FMEA

7
  • Function Requirement Failure in FMEA
  • Severity in FMEA (AIAG-VDA) | Explained with Examples
  • Occurrence in FMEA (AIAG-VDA) | Explained with Examples
  • Detection in FMEA (AIAG-VDA) | Explained with Examples
  • RPN vs Action Priority (AP) – Why RPN is Outdated
  • FMEA Linkages – ISO 9001, IATF 16949, APQP, PPAP.
  • Why AIAG-VDA 7-Step Approach?

Step-1: Planning & Preparation in FMEA

4
  • Step 1 – Planning & Preparation in FMEA (AIAG-VDA Standard)
  • The Five Ts in FMEA – Intent, Timing, Team, Task, Tools
  • Defining Scope, Boundaries & Assumptions in FMEA
  • Cross-Functional Team Formation in FMEA

Step 2: Structure Analysis in FMEA

4
  • Step 2 – Structure Analysis in FMEA
  • System, Subsystem, and Component Breakdown in FMEA
  • Process Flow – Structure Tree & Block Diagram in FMEA
  • Motor Stator Winding – Structure Analysis in FMEA Example

Step 3: Function Analysis in FMEA

3
  • Step 3 – Function Analysis in FMEA
  • Defining Functions & Requirements in FMEA
  • How to Write Measurable Requirements in FMEA

Step 4: Failure Analysis in FMEA

6
  • Step 4 – Failure Analysis in FMEA (Failure Modes, Effects, Causes)
  • Function Net in FMEA | Chain of Functions
  • Failure at Mode Level – Failure Modes
  • Effects of Failure in FMEA
  • Causes of Failure in FMEA (Design vs Process)
  • Cascading Failures – Failure Cause Mode Effect Relationship in FMEA

Step 5: Risk Analysis in FMEA

9
  • Current Detection Controls in FMEA
  • Current Prevention Controls in FMEA (AIAG-VDA Standard)
  • Risk Evaluation in FMEA
  • Action Priority (AP) vs RPN in FMEA
  • Action Priority in FMEA (AIAG-VDA Standard)
  • Step 5 – Risk Analysis in FMEA
  • Severity in FMEA (AIAG-VDA) | Explained with Examples
  • Occurrence in FMEA (AIAG-VDA) | Explained with Examples
  • Detection in FMEA (AIAG-VDA) | Explained with Examples

Step 6: Optimization in FMEA

2
  • Tracking & Closing Actions in FMEA
  • Step 6 – Optimization in FMEA

Step 7: Results Documentation in FMEA

3
  • Customer Communication & Lessons Learned in FMEA
  • FMEA Report (Summary Table)
  • Step 7 – Results Documentation in FMEA

1

3
  • Doc 1
  • 1.1
    • Doc 1.1
  • 1.3
    • Doc 1.3

2

1
  • 2.1
    • Doc 2.1

4

1
  • Doc 4
View Categories
  • Home
  • FMEA Knowledge base
  • Step 5: Risk Analysis in FMEA
  • Risk Evaluation in FMEA

Risk Evaluation in FMEA

FMEA Expert
Updated on September 6, 2025

3 min read

In Step 5: Risk Analysis of the AIAG-VDA 7-Step FMEA approach, once Severity, Occurrence, and Detection have been rated, the next task is to evaluate the risks.

πŸ‘‰ Risk Evaluation Criteria answer the question:
β€œDo we need to take action, or is the risk acceptable as it is?”

The AIAG-VDA standard uses Action Priority (AP) instead of the outdated Risk Priority Number (RPN) to guide these decisions.


What is Risk Evaluation in FMEA? #

  • Definition: Risk evaluation is the process of interpreting the S, O, D ratings to decide whether a failure mode requires corrective action.
  • Goal: Ensure that safety-critical, compliance-related, and high-impact risks are always prioritized.
  • Tool: The Action Priority (AP) table provides standardized evaluation criteria.

πŸ“Œ Risk evaluation does not eliminate subjectivity, but it ensures decisions are consistent, documented, and customer-focused.


Key Elements of Risk Evaluation Criteria #

1. Severity (S) – Effect-Driven

  • Highest priority factor.
  • Severity β‰₯ 9 or 10 (safety/regulatory risks) = High Priority (H), action required regardless of O or D.
  • Example: Airbag fails to deploy β†’ Severity = 10 β†’ Always High.

2. Occurrence (O) – Cause Frequency

  • Reflects likelihood of cause.
  • Higher occurrence = higher Action Priority.
  • Example: Bolt under-torqued found in 5% audits β†’ Occurrence = 7 β†’ High risk.

3. Detection (D) – Control Strength

  • Reflects ability of controls to detect before customer impact.
  • Weak detection (ratings 7–10) pushes AP towards High.
  • Example: Visual inspection only β†’ Detection = 8 β†’ Weak control.

4. Action Priority (AP) – Final Decision

  • Combines S, O, D into High (H), Medium (M), Low (L) priorities.
  • Defines whether action is mandatory, recommended, or optional.

AIAG-VDA Risk Evaluation Categories #

CategoryMeaningAction Guidance
High (H)Unacceptable riskAction required immediately
Medium (M)Acceptable with cautionAction recommended, justify if no action taken
Low (L)Acceptable riskNo action required, justification must be documented

πŸ“Œ Even Low (L) risks must be documented with justification.


Example – Risk Evaluation Using AP #

PFMEA – Bolting Operation

  • Function: Secure suspension bolt at 100 Β± 5 Nm.
  • Failure Mode: Under-torque.
  • Severity = 9 (safety-critical).
  • Occurrence = 3 (rare).
  • Detection = 7 (weak, manual check).

πŸ‘‰ AP = High Priority (H) β†’ Action required.

Corrective Action: Introduced automatic torque monitoring β†’ Detection improved to 2 β†’ AP reduced to Medium (M).


Case Study – DFMEA for Electric Motor #

  • Function: Provide rotation at 2000 Β± 50 RPM.
  • Failure Mode: Motor does not rotate.
  • Severity = 8.
  • Occurrence = 5.
  • Detection = 6.

πŸ‘‰ AP = Medium (M) β†’ Action recommended.
Decision: Team added additional insulation and motor testing.


Best Practices for Risk Evaluation in FMEA #

  1. Always prioritize Severity first – especially S β‰₯ 9 risks.
  2. Use real data (SPC, warranty, lessons learned) to set O ratings.
  3. Be realistic about Detection – manual checks = weak detection.
  4. Document justifications for all Medium and Low risks.
  5. Review AP regularly as design/process changes or controls improve.
  6. Involve cross-functional teams to reduce subjectivity.

Common Mistakes to Avoid #

  • Still using RPN thresholds instead of AP.
  • Ignoring safety risks with low occurrence values.
  • Overrating manual inspections as β€œstrong detection.”
  • Failing to document why Low or Medium risks were accepted.

Why Risk Evaluation Criteria Matter #

  • Ensures customer safety and compliance come first.
  • Provides objective, consistent, and auditable prioritization.
  • Helps allocate resources to the most critical risks.
  • Strengthens trust with OEMs and auditors.

Key Takeaways #

  • Risk Evaluation in FMEA = interpreting S, O, D β†’ Action Priority (AP).
  • Severity β‰₯ 9–10 always = High Priority, mandatory action.
  • AP categories: High = action required, Medium = action recommended, Low = acceptable with justification.
  • Risk evaluation ensures FMEA is a practical risk-prevention tool, not just paperwork.

Next Lesson #

πŸ‘‰ Continue with Lesson 3.7: Step 6 – Optimization (Actions & Re-Evaluation)

Updated on September 6, 2025

Are this content helpful..

  • Happy
  • Normal
  • Sad

Share This Article :

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
Current Prevention Controls in FMEA (AIAG-VDA Standard)Action Priority (AP) vs RPN in FMEA
Table of Contents
  • What is Risk Evaluation in FMEA?
  • Key Elements of Risk Evaluation Criteria
  • AIAG-VDA Risk Evaluation Categories
  • Example – Risk Evaluation Using AP
  • Case Study – DFMEA for Electric Motor
  • Best Practices for Risk Evaluation in FMEA
  • Common Mistakes to Avoid
  • Why Risk Evaluation Criteria Matter
  • Key Takeaways
  • Next Lesson
  • Free FMEA Course
  • Services
Contact Us
Contact Us
logo_color

One touch solution for FMEA documentation training or creation and support.

Learn

  • Knowledge base
  • Training
  • Newsletter

Company

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Services
  • Products

Connect

© 2025 Quality Assist

Powered by Quality Assist